Donald Trump Slams 2026 GRAMMYs and Threatens to Sue Trevor Noah Over Epstein Island Joke

U.S. President Donald Trump has sharply criticized the 68th Annual GRAMMY Awards, branding the broadcast “virtually unwatchable” and threatening legal action against comedian and host Trevor Noah over a joke the President called false and defamatory. The unusual clash between a cultural event and national politics has quickly become one of the most talked‑about stories in entertainment and political news today. 

During the live telecast on February 2, 2026, Trevor Noah; hosting the GRAMMYs for the sixth and final time delivered a mix of music commentary and political humor. After Billie Eilish and Finneas won the Song of the Year award, Noah said:

There you have it, song of the year! Congratulations, Billie Eilish. Wow. That’s a Grammy that every artist wants… almost as much as Trump wants Greenland, which makes sense because Epstein’s island is gone, he needs a new one to hang out with Bill Clinton.” 

As the audience reacted with gasps and laughter, Noah added:

I told you, it’s my last year! What are you going to do about it?” 

Shortly after the broadcast ended, Trump took to his social platform Truth Social with a forceful reaction. He began by dismissing the awards show itself as:

the WORST, virtually unwatchable! CBS is lucky not to have this garbage litter their airwaves any longer.” 

Turning his attention to Noah’s joke, Trump wrote that the comedian “INCORRECTLY” claimed Trump and Clinton had spent time on Epstein’s island:

I can’t speak for Bill, but I have never been to Epstein Island, nor anywhere close, and until tonight’s false and defamatory statement, have never been accused of being there, not even by the Fake News Media.” 

“It looks like I’ll be sending my lawyers to sue this poor, pathetic, talentless, dope of an M.C., and suing him for plenty$. Get ready Noah, I’m going to have some fun with you!” 

Award shows like the GRAMMYs have long mixed humor with social commentary, but Noah’s line touched on a subject; Jeffrey Epstein and his connections to powerful figures that has been under renewed public scrutiny since large sets of Epstein files were released. 

Trump’s response continues a pattern of reacting strongly to commentary he deems inaccurate or unfair. In his post, he even referenced past legal settlements with major networks, suggesting precedent for how such disputes have played out previously. 

The 2026 GRAMMY Awards were already notable for politically charged moments, including artists wearing pins and referencing social and immigration policies during acceptance speeches. Amid that backdrop, Noah’s joke stood out as a comedic moment that crossed into political territory, prompting an unprecedented presidential reaction tied directly to an awards show broadcast. 

A line meant as playful satire at one of music’s biggest nights spiraled into a political story dominating headlines across news and social media. At the intersection of comedy, culture, and politics, the Grammy moment underscores how quickly entertainment can become part of national discourse especially when public figures respond in forceful fashion.

Spotify and Major Record Labels Sue Anna’s Archive for $13 Trillion Over Music Theft

In a staggering legal move, Spotify, alongside Universal Music Group, Sony Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group, has filed a $13 trillion lawsuit against Anna’s Archive, the self-described “largest truly open library in human history.”

The lawsuit claims that Anna’s Archive has illegally distributed copyrighted music on a massive scale, including nearly 86 million music files scraped from streaming platforms. According to court filings, the platform not only shared the content but also made it easily accessible, violating U.S. copyright laws and agreements with artists and record labels.

The legal complaint describes Anna’s Archive’s operations as a “brazen theft of millions of files containing nearly all of the world’s commercial sound recordings.”

By applying statutory maximums of up to $150,000 per infringed track, the damages amount to the eye-popping $13 trillion figure, one of the largest ever sought in music industry history. Legal experts, however, caution that courts rarely award the full statutory damages, especially in cases involving international defendants.

The lawsuit was filed in late December 2025 and went public in mid-January 2026. Since then, a U.S. federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, resulting in the suspension of several Anna’s Archive domain names, including .org and .se.

Spotify and the major labels have accused the platform of multiple violations, including:

  • Copyright infringement
  • Breach of contract
  • Violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
  • Violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)

Anna’s Archive has previously claimed that its content gathering is intended for preservation purposes, rather than commercial exploitation. However, the plaintiffs argue that making copyrighted works accessible without permission constitutes illegal distribution, regardless of intent.

The operators of Anna’s Archive remain anonymous, and their location outside the U.S. adds complexity to the legal process.

Industry analysts say the case could set a major precedent for online archives and music preservation projects, redefining what constitutes legal access to digital content.

The legal battle is still unfolding, with initial court hearings expected later in 2026. Analysts predict this lawsuit could reshape how digital content and open libraries operate, especially for music, which remains highly protected under copyright law.

For now, Anna’s Archive is under intense legal scrutiny, and the outcome could impact millions of users and the broader debate over free access versus copyright protection.

Cardi B Vows to Fight Non-Payment Lawsuit Levied Against Her and ex-husband Offset

Cardi B vows to fight the lawsuit against her and her now-divorced husband Offset. In the lawsuit, the property owner of the mansion used in the music video of her hit single “Like What’ claims she and her estranged husband Offset duped them into using their property for the music video “without paying full market value.”

In response, the Grammy winner has vowed to defend herself against the “greedy owners.”“The problem is people wanna find loopholes and get over but IRON YOUR BEST SUIT BITCH, I’ll see you in court!!!” the Grammy-winning rapper wrote on X.

In her statement on X, Cardi B claimed the property owners were paid $10,000 in cash to use the property for 24 hours “We paid those people $10,000 IN CASH to rent the property for a whole 24 hours that same day 6am to 6am the next morning and we went over by ONE hour which we paid overage fees to the realtor for in March.” She also claimed the owners are trying to get more money from there through legal loopholes: “Now they wanna finesse us trying to say we told them it was a TikTok video when that was nowhere in the contract and like they didn’t hear the whole song playing and see how long we was shooting….Why would it take us 24 hours to shoot a TikTok? The problem is people wanna find loopholes and get over…”

To add to her defence Cardi B claims the owners were on set when the shoot was taking place: “There was cameras all over and both the realtors and the owners was there the ENTIRE time… I got pics and videos of them on set!!

According to the mansion owner’s 11-page complaint, Cardi and Offset had their eyes set on using the property’s highly distinctive design and “devised a plan” to use it “without paying full market value.” The property owner, Bi LLC, alleged the ex-couple reached out through their representatives in late 2023 or early 2024 and booked the house anonymously “under the false pretense” it would be used for a TikTok video. The house was previously home to Justin Bieber.

The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, which included still photographs from the video shoot and noted that the music video produced during the shoot, “Like What,” had garnered more than 26 million views on YouTube since its release six months ago.

Mayorkun slams Tiktok influencer Nickie Dabarbie for a ₦1 billion lawsuit for Defamatory Statements

In response to claims made by TikTok influencer Dabarbie, Mayorkun sues the TikTok influence with Mayorkun slams TikTok influencer Nickie Dabarbie for a ₦1 billion lawsuit for defamatory statements.

Precious Kingsley, popularly known as Nickie Dabarbie, accused musicians Skiibii and Mayorkun of attempted murder for money rituals.

In a series of posts shared via her Instagram account, Dabarbie claimed both singers use multiple girls for rituals. In addition to her claims, she said the artists gave her dog poop to eat. On her Instagram live she also accused the musicians of sending soldiers after her.

In response to these massive claims, Mayorkun is suing the influencer.

Scroll to Top